Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Match Recap results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,446 of 16,562 topics). This Match Recap is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Match Recap
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos