Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mass Graves results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 763 hits. Analysis detected 4,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,998 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,514 of 16,562 topics). This Mass Graves is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Mass Graves
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠91%Mass Graves (selected)10%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,998
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 37.4%37.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 38.2%38.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.2%20.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 38.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos