Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Masks results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 4,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (1,896 of 15,448 topics). This Masks is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Masks
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠88%Masks (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510087.7% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 27.5%27.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.5%21.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.3%15.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos