Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mars Exploration results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 3,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,295 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,203 of 16,562 topics). This Mars Exploration is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Mars Exploration
Topic details
Total words: 3,295
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst