Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marriage In Film results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 597 hits . Analysis detected 3,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,896 of 16,562 topics). This Marriage In Film is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Marriage In Film
Topic details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst