Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Strategy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 4,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,384 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,251 of 16,558 topics). This Market Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Market Strategy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,384
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos