Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Market Impact results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 323 hits . Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Market Impact is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Market Impact
Topic details
Total words: 3,092
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst