Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marjorie Taylor Greene results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,217 hits. Analysis detected 8,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,357 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,348 of 16,562 topics). This Marjorie Taylor Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
Topic details
Total words: 6,357
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos