Topic summary
⁠7%2 analyzed articles/videos606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maritime Archaeology results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,227 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,937 of 16,562 topics). This Maritime Archaeology is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Maritime Archaeology
Topic details
Total words: 4,227
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos