Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video2,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Ecology results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 6,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,136 of 16,562 topics). This Marine Ecology is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Marine Ecology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos