Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marilyn Monroe results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,019 hits. Analysis detected 10,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,848 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,132 of 15,765 topics). This Marilyn Monroe is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Marilyn Monroe
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,848
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos