Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariah Carey results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 528 hits. Analysis detected 2,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,453 of 16,562 topics). This Mariah Carey is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Mariah Carey
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,492
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Horn Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos