Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Bartiromo results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 3,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,610 of 16,562 topics). This Maria Bartiromo is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Maria Bartiromo
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠73%Maria Bartiromo (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos