Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Cucurella results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 1,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,306 of 16,562 topics). This Marc Cucurella is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Marc Cucurella
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos