Topic summary
48%3 analyzed articles/videos1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marathon results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 820 hits. Analysis detected 3,845 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,536 of 15,748 topics). This Marathon is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Marathon
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,880
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate