Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manifesto Analysis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,410 of 16,562 topics). This Manifesto Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Manifesto Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 3,693
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos