Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Manhattanhenge results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 2,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Manhattanhenge is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Manhattanhenge
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos