Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Macomb County results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 444 faulty-reasoning hits from 954 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,011 of 16,562 topics). This Macomb County is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Macomb County
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 954
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles954 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.9%1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos