Topic summary
⁠79%4 analyzed articles/videos4,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Travel results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 5,796 hits. Analysis detected 21,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,148 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,895 of 15,690 topics). This Luxury Travel is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Luxury Travel
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,148
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 33.8%33.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.6%19.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos