Topic summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Brands results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,181 hits . Analysis detected 7,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,801 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,473 of 16,562 topics). This Luxury Brands is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Luxury Brands
Topic details
Total words: 6,801
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst