Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lunar New Year results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 4,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,385 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,634 of 15,769 topics). This Lunar New Year is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Lunar New Year
Topic details
Total words: 3,385
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst