Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Wilson Kendall Yates results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Recency Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 821 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,273 of 16,562 topics). This Luke Wilson Kendall Yates is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Luke Wilson Kendall Yates
Topic details
Total words: 1,314
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos