Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video3,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Low Income Workers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 2,322 hits. Analysis detected 12,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,189 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,738 of 16,562 topics). This Low Income Workers is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Low Income Workers
Topic details
Total words: 9,189
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos