Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Loss Of A Public Figure results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,693 of 16,562 topics). This Loss Of A Public Figure is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Loss Of A Public Figure
Topic details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos