Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Rams results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 66.9% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 2,430 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (736 of 16,562 topics). This Los Angeles Rams is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Rams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 66.9%66.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 22.0%22.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 20.6%20.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.0%19.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.8%22.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 66.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 22.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Red Herring: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.7%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos