Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Mayoral Race results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,712 hits. Analysis detected 15,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,744 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,870 of 15,350 topics). This Los Angeles Mayoral Race is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Mayoral Race
Topic details
Total words: 12,744
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos