Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Mayor results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 6,080 hits. Analysis detected 21,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,655 of 15,267 topics). This Los Angeles Mayor is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Mayor
Topic details
Total words: 20,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos