Topic summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorenzo Salgado Araujo results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 3,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,567 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,596 of 16,562 topics). This Lorenzo Salgado Araujo is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos