Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Longevity Economy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 3,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,829 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Longevity Economy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Longevity Economy
Topic details
Total words: 2,829
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 26.6%26.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos