Topic summary
⁠91%3 analyzed articles/videos2,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Long Covid results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,370 hits. Analysis detected 8,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,482 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,580 of 16,562 topics). This Long Covid is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Long Covid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,482
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.3%18.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos