Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shiv Sudhakar results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 1,157 hits . Analysis detected 4,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (376 of 6,628 authors). This Shiv Sudhakar is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Shiv Sudhakar
Author details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.3% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 49.2% 49.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 17.0% 17.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.7% 34.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.2% 12.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Author 49.2%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 34.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst