Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos3,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These London results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 921 hits. Analysis detected 8,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,760 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (10,909 of 15,447 topics). This London is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
London
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,760
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos