Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Taxation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 808 hits. Analysis detected 2,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,039 of 16,562 topics). This Local Taxation is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Local Taxation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.6%32.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos