Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brenden Moore results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 1,189 hits . Analysis detected 5,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,301 of 6,628 authors). This Brenden Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Brenden Moore
Author details
Total words: 4,936
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 24.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst