Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Running Groups results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 1,525 hits. Analysis detected 5,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,578 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,259 of 16,562 topics). This Local Running Groups is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Local Running Groups
Topic details
Total words: 4,578
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.3% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.3%33.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos