Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video765 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Business Development results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,589 of 16,562 topics). This Local Business Development is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Local Business Development
Topic details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos