Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Living In results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 5,440 hits. Analysis detected 24,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,481 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,581 of 15,265 topics). This Living In is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Living In
Topic details
Total words: 23,481
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 23.2%23.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.5%13.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos