Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Living Better results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 921 hits . Analysis detected 3,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,521 of 16,494 topics). This Living Better is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Living Better
Topic details
Total words: 1,572
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.8% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 58.6% 58.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 40.7% 40.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 58.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 40.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst