Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Aubrey results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 13,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,096 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,671 of 6,244 authors). This Allison Aubrey is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Allison Aubrey
Author details
Total words: 14,096
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst