Topic summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Live Action Adaptation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 4,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,615 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,083 of 16,562 topics). This Live Action Adaptation is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Live Action Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 5,615
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos