Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video2,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Literary History results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 949 hits. Analysis detected 5,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,106 of 16,562 topics). This Literary History is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Literary History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos