Topic summary
11% 4 analyzed articles/videos 723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Life results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 492 hits . Analysis detected 3,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,741 of 16,132 topics). This Life is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Life
Topic details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst