Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These License To Kill results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 982 hits. Analysis detected 4,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,861 of 16,562 topics). This License To Kill is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
License To Kill
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.9%24.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos