Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These LGBTQ Studies results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 2,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This LGBTQ Studies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
LGBTQ Studies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos