Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Let's Talk results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 967 hits. Analysis detected 5,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,685 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,131 of 15,597 topics). This Let's Talk is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Let's Talk
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠61%Let's Talk (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,685
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.6%20.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos