Topic summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lego results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 1,463 hits . Analysis detected 5,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,617 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,045 of 16,562 topics). This Lego is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Lego
Topic details
Total words: 4,617
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 31.7% 31.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 31.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst