Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Pay results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 3,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,174 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,482 of 16,562 topics). This Legislative Pay is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Legislative Pay
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,174
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos