Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legionella Bacteria results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 4,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,554 of 16,562 topics). This Legionella Bacteria is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Legionella Bacteria
Topic details
Total words: 5,744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos