Topic summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Tactics results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 876 hits . Analysis detected 2,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,151 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,725 of 15,690 topics). This Legal Tactics is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Legal Tactics
Topic details
Total words: 2,151
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 40.7% 40.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Topic 40.7%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst