Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal And Ethical Considerations In Mental Health results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 637 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (7,428 of 16,562 topics). This Legal And Ethical Considerations In Mental Health is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Legal And Ethical Considerations In Mental Health
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.5%21.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos